Lets look at the pros and cons of rental and builtin down site
Let's consider the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc's server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company.
It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
웹하드 순위 OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage plus the Webhard's original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the solution.
The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, and this can be fully built in Soho, so the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.
It is now essential for Soho to establish a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files online at a set monthly cost. Because of this using web hard is becoming common.
But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.
The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company won't adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files by default. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Therefore, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very useful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll take a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one in line with the reality and needs.
