Down site

fast file site

When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. p2p 순위 Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only must be in a folder.

You must share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. So when it's in that state, you need to discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect with other Google services such as Gmail.

Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.



There are probably the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)



Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.





The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.



File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little usage of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.